>> Because I do not see why you need to load FileSystem or Moose.
>
> I had forgotten than FileSystem was in 2.0; I don't see Moose anywhere in the
> groups menu.
>
> But the general question is: when the stable load fails, what is plan-B for
> the user? I couldn't work this out from the source. I can see that there are
> various versions defined (eg, '4.0.9') but I'm not clear on where/what class
> to send the required messages to.
>
> On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 22:44:34 +0100, Sean P. DeNigris <s...@clipperadams.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thomas Worthington-2 wrote
>>> it would be nice if the "stable version" did not appear as an option on
>>> those which do not
>>> have one.
>>
>> I couldn't agree more. The configuration browser seems extremely limited. I
>> guess it will be replaced by Versionner? That having been said, it's better
>> than nothing, and provided to us for free, so if you are really want this
>> fixed, at minimum open an issue, or better yet have a go yourself!
>
> I'm still trying to get to the point where I can produce a working
> application and be familiar with how things work in a proper, modern OO
> system. I'm employed during the day as a PHP-programmer and I can feel it
> rotting my brain.
>
> I agree that the browser is (much) better than nothing, I'm mainly just
> trying to find out what to do when there isn't a #stable version.
Start using an image that we build on jenkins for example Seaside ((we should
have a seaside jenkins job) if not we should do one. Please someone add a bug
entry if there is no seaside build.)
And load some of the package you need to build your application.
- you can read the monticello/metacello chapter on the Pharo by example
2 book.
We are working on automatically a process and tool to validate all the packages
and dsitribution.
This way we will all be sure that configruation are loading.
We are also working on a tool to express configuration.
So let us know what is missing for you to build your application.
Stef
