Tom Lane wrote: > Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Anyway, is there anyone who thinks the "cycle the queue every 6 weeks or 2 > > months or suitable short period" is a *bad* idea? It might be hard to > > pull > > off, but we won't know until we try. > > It seems worth a try --- we can certainly abandon it easily if it > doesn't work. > > Personally I feel every six weeks would be too short: we'd be talking > only a month of work between commit-fests. I like a two-month cycle > partly because it wouldn't rotate relative to the calendar: we'd always > know that the first half of every odd-numbered month, or something like > that, is commit-fest time.
Sounds fine to me. Basically it is a "reviewers, get your heads out of your monitors and help other patch submitters". Not a lot of additional fun for reviewers, of course, but probably necessary. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
