"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I know I just love it when a customer breaks something and I ask what > changed and it is 56 different things ;) > > My question is.. with a checkpoint every 2 months, would it make it > very easy to release every 6 (or 4 or 3 or 9) months? I am not saying > we "have" to but it certainly opens up the possibility to the argument > I made.
We could release "alpha" releases. But that assumes that these reviews actually result in stuff getting committed even if they're not 100% complete. I think that would be a good thing but I don't think everyone else agrees. Also, not all reviewers are committers. -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
