On 2/19/07, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Am Montag, 19. Februar 2007 13:12 schrieb Alvaro Herrera: >> I don't understand -- what problem you got with "NO OPERATION"? It >> seemed a sound idea to me. > It seems nonorthogonal. What if only some of the tables you mentioned did not > exist? Do you get "SOME OPERATION"? I'd say you get DROP TABLE as long as at least one table was dropped.
How about DROP TABLE <cnt> where 'cnt' is the number of tables dropped ? Thanks, Pavan -- EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
