"Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 2006-12-14 at 13:52 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> I'm actually not so sure that this is a good idea. The lexical
>> structure should be exactly the same, and some things like include
>> files might become useful as well, so why should all this be
>> replicated?
> I assumed the actual lexer would be the same, just the code that invokes
> it would be different. I'm happy to do things either way.
Yeah, but the actual lexer is [ looks... ] less than 50 lines of flex
code. I think refactoring stuff to the point where that could be shared
would be more pain than it's worth ...
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
