On Thu, 2006-12-14 at 13:52 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Simon Riggs wrote: > > > It would probably be far easier for long-term maintenance if you > > > just built an independent lexer, instead of trying to make > > > guc-file.l serve multiple masters. > > > > Will do. > > I'm actually not so sure that this is a good idea. The lexical > structure should be exactly the same, and some things like include > files might become useful as well, so why should all this be > replicated?
I assumed the actual lexer would be the same, just the code that invokes it would be different. I'm happy to do things either way. -- Simon Riggs EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
