Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> This patch has broken half the buildfarm, and I've still not seen a
> >> rationale why we need to make such a change at all.
> 
> > Fixed with attached patch.  The use case for this was not FETCH, but
> > MOVE for > 2gig tables.
> 
> There is *no* credible use case for this (hint: MOVE FORWARD/BACKWARD
> ALL does not need this to work for >2G tables).  It is not worth the
> extra computational cycles that it imposes on every machine whether they
> use the feature or not, and it is certainly not worth the developer time
> we're expending to fix this poorly written patch.  Please revert it.

Already done because of bad coding.  You want the TODO item removed too?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
       subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to