Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> There is *no* credible use case for this (hint: MOVE FORWARD/BACKWARD
>> ALL does not need this to work for >2G tables).
> Already done because of bad coding. You want the TODO item removed too?
As I said, I see no use case for it. Maybe if Moore's Law holds up for
another five or ten years, it'll look like a useful feature then ...
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
