On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 05:11:03PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote: > On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 10:59:45AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > Are we sure we don't want the patch for a non-subquery version of SET > > > > ROW for 8.2? > > > > > > > > o Allow UPDATE tab SET ROW (col, ...) = (...) for updating > > > > multiple columns > > > > > > It seems to be moderately useful as a notational convenience for > > > now. > > > > > > Is it too hard to rip it back out once the full row support > > > arrives? That seems speculation at best anyway. > > > > That's what I was thinking. Glad someone else replied. ;-) > > If you're looking for votes, +1. I'll gladly take a subset of the > SQL standard UPDATE table SET (...) = (...) over having nothing.
+1 here, too. :) Cheers, D -- David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://fetter.org/ phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Skype: davidfetter Remember to vote! ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
