Bruce Momjian wrote:
Robert Treat wrote:
On Saturday 12 August 2006 16:16, David Fetter wrote:
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 05:11:03PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 10:59:45AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Are we sure we don't want the patch for a non-subquery version of
SET ROW for 8.2?
o Allow UPDATE tab SET ROW (col, ...) = (...) for updating
multiple columns
It seems to be moderately useful as a notational convenience for
now.
Is it too hard to rip it back out once the full row support
arrives? That seems speculation at best anyway.
That's what I was thinking. Glad someone else replied. ;-)
If you're looking for votes, +1. I'll gladly take a subset of the
SQL standard UPDATE table SET (...) = (...) over having nothing.
+1 here, too. :)
+1
I am working now to get this into 8.2.
I am glad to read this. But what does it mean to me? Shall I change the
patch someway?
Susanne
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
