Hi Dave,
Sorry I missed you at the Summit. I would've liked to discuss PL/J
versus PL/Java with you.
What is the status of PL/J? I haven't seen much activity there over the
last 10 months. Does it run on Windows yet? Are you planning a first
release anytime soon? Do you have any active users? Does the project
still have over 40 dependencies to other components? The last time I
looked (August last year) a beta-0.1.1 was planned. I didn't manage to
built it and it didn't seem anywhere close production readiness.
Perhaps it's no surprise that I disagree when you say PL/J could be
considered in the same light as PL/Java. Then again, I'm fairly biased ;-)
Regards,
Thomas Hallgren
Dave Cramer wrote:
Absolutely PL/J should be considered in the same light as PL/Java.
Consider this a request for PL/J to be included in the core.
Dave
On 11-Jul-06, at 12:50 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
David,
It's good to integrate things with the core as needed. What plans do
we have to integrate PL/J?
None, if the PL/J team doesn't speak up. So far I have yet to see a
request for PL/J or even a release notice.
--Josh
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
