On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 11:21:54PM +0900, Satoshi Nagayasu wrote: > Tom, > > Tom Lane wrote: > > IOW pljava is (already) bigger than the other four PLs put > > together. > > > > I'm inclined to think that pljava is best off staying as a > > separate project. > > I was very confused some recent PL/Java versions can't be compiled > because of PostgreSQL internal changes. > > If people think pl/java is important for PostgreSQL, pl/java should > be included in PG core tree, and should have its regression tests. > > I think PL should be integrated with core tightly.
It's good to integrate things with the core as needed. What plans do we have to integrate PL/J? Cheers, D -- David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://fetter.org/ phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Skype: davidfetter Remember to vote! ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
