On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 01:25:34PM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > >I do agree that its probably not worth allocating core resources to > >this, but spouting outdated FUD is really making you two look foolish. > > And which FUD would this be?
That Feb. 31st is a valid date in MySQL. You can now configure it to reject that (don't know if that's the default or not). > > > >You have to understand that MySQL evolves just like PostgreSQL does. So > >you better focus on advertising where PostgreSQL shines instead of > >poking fun at something you apparently do not follow. > > Uhmmm, I am not even going to bother responding to this part. It is > obvious that *you* don't follow MySQL versus PostgreSQL. > > No offense but the development models and thus evolution thereof are > completely different. You just proved one of my points. It's pretty easy for executives to understand that trying to store Feb. 31st in their database is probably a bad idea, but arguments about development models and their impact on software quality are likely to fall on deaf/befuddled ears. -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
