On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 11:48:50AM -0500, Mark Woodward wrote: > Well, I'm sure that one "could" use debian's solution, but that's the > problem, it isn't PostgreSQL's solution. Shouldn't PostgreSQL provide the > mechanisms? Will debian support FreeBSD? NetBSD? Is it in the PostgreSQL > admin manual?
I meant that it's a good start. It's a fully functional solution (for its intended audience) that works now and thus might give you ideas how you want your solution to work. > Argg, the pgfoundary is sort of the "free speech zones" that the U.S. sets > up out of view of the president and the press. Yea, its there, and if you > go out of your way, you can find it. Think of Arthur Dent's "The plans > were on display!" My point is only that since trying to convince people on -hackers to write the code isn't working, perhaps someone (you?) could write it seperately for possible inclusion later. If someone writes it all themselves then they can send a patch. OTOH if several people want to collaborate on a solution, something like pgfoundary is useful. Have a nice day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a > tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone > else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
