...<reads paper>... ok, interesting. Did they say that Oracle isn't using aio ?The paper I linked to seemed to suggest that they weren't using async IO in 9.2 -- which is fairly old. I'm not sure why the authors didn't test 10g. I can't see that. They that Oracle has no more than one outstanding I/O operation in flight per concurrent query, and they appear to think that's a bad thing. I'm not seeing that myself. Perhaps once I sleep on it, it'll become clear what they're getting at. One theory for lack of aio in Oracle as tested in that paper would be that they were testing on Linux. Since aio is relatively new in Linux I wouldn't be surprised if Oracle didn't actually use it until it's known to be widely deployed in the field and to have proven reliability. Perhaps we've reached that state around now, and so Oracle may not yet have released an aio-capable Linux version of their RDBMS. Just a theory...someone from those tubular towers lurking here could tell us for sure I guess... |
- Re: [HACKERS] ice-broker scan thread David Boreham
- Re: [HACKERS] ice-broker scan thread Gavin Sherry
- Re: [HACKERS] ice-broker scan thread Jonah H. Harris
- Re: [HACKERS] ice-broker scan thread Qingqing Zhou
- Re: [HACKERS] ice-broker scan thread Mark Kirkwood
- Re: [HACKERS] ice-broker scan thread Qingqing Zhou
- Re: [HACKERS] ice-broker scan thread Qingqing Zhou
- Re: [HACKERS] ice-broker scan thread David Boreham
- Re: [HACKERS] ice-broker scan thread Qingqing Zhou
- Re: [HACKERS] ice-broker scan thread David Boreham
- Re: [HACKERS] ice-broker scan thread Gavin Sherry