On Mon, 28 Nov 2005, Tom Lane wrote: > Gavin Sherry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I haven't had time to prototype whether we can easily implement async IO > > Just as with any suggestion to depend on threads, you are going to have > to show results that border on astounding to have any chance of getting > this in. Otherwise the portability issues are just going to make it not > worth the trouble.
The architecture I am looking at would not rely on threads. I didn't want to jump on list and waive my hands until I had something to show, but since Qingqing is looking at the issue I thought I better raise it. Gavin ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
