Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > fix ALTER SCHEMA RENAME for sequence dependency, or remove feature
I've posted a proposed patch to fix this. The patch requires an initdb (to add new sequence functions), so if we do that we may as well also fix the 32/64bit risk mentioned here: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-09/msg01241.php Also, the floor seems open to discuss whether or not to revert the file access functions to their pre-beta2 APIs. I've got mixed feelings about that myself, but you can certainly make a case that the current definitions are not enough cleaner than what was there before to justify changing. This seems particularly true for pg_cancel_backend(), which already was in the core in 8.0. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
