On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
fix ALTER SCHEMA RENAME for sequence dependency, or remove feature
I've posted a proposed patch to fix this. The patch requires an initdb
(to add new sequence functions), so if we do that we may as well also
fix the 32/64bit risk mentioned here:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-09/msg01241.php
Also, the floor seems open to discuss whether or not to revert the file
access functions to their pre-beta2 APIs. I've got mixed feelings about
that myself, but you can certainly make a case that the current
definitions are not enough cleaner than what was there before to justify
changing. This seems particularly true for pg_cancel_backend(), which
already was in the core in 8.0.
IMHO, changes like this *should not* have been allowed during beta, period
... even during feature freeze, it would have been questionable :(
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
