pgman wrote: > Is enable_constraint_exclusion the proper name for this feature? I know > we have enable* in the optimizer settings, but that naming seems > unfortunate in that we should have just called it hash_join and it could > be enabled/disabled. > > I am thinking we should just call it constraint_exclusion.
So, given the silence on this, I assume people think we should rename this before beta starts. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
