Joshua D. Drake wrote: > >> > >>I am thinking we should just call it constraint_exclusion. > > > > > > So, given the silence on this, I assume people think we should rename > > this before beta starts. > > Well it depends either one seems correct per the postgresql.conf. For > example enable_seqscan, or "add"_missing_from_clause. > > It seems that if the postgresql.conf parameter is actually causing a > different behavior we tend to note the behavior in the prefix (thus > enable/add) but that if it is more general we done (thus log_) . > > I don't care either way but it seemed something to note before the > decision was made.
I thought about that, but is seems all our booleans could logically fall into the category of being enabled/disabled. For add_missing_from, the add word is so people realize that it is really _adding_ to the FROM list, so I see it as different. Anyway, change committed. I can always change it back if people change their mind. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
