On Wed, 27 Jul 2005, Tom Lane wrote: > Neil (or anyone else with an opinion), > > I'm finding several uses in the planner for some new List primitives > defined as below. I'd like to push these into list.c, but before that, > has anyone got any serious objections? How about suggestions for better > names?
list_add() doesn't really describe what it does. I was thinking either list_cond_add() or list_merge(). I think list_add_all is also ambiguous. What about list_merge_all() or, even, list_merge_list()? Gavin ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly