Thomas Swan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 7/28/05, Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> How about list_append_distinct and list_concat_distinct?
>> Those names are fine with me.
> list_append_unique and list_concat_unique might be a little clearer, unless
> you want to retain the sqlism of distinct.
I like those too --- sold, unless anyone objects?
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
