On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 09:30:20PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote: > > I'd like to suggest altering the syntax of VACUUM so that it is possible > to issue the command VACUUM DATABASE. The keyword DATABASE would be > optional, to allow backward compatibility.
Huh, so why not have an optional LAZY? I understand your concern against "VACUUM LAZY table", which is not helpful -- so your advice would have to be rephrased as "issue a database-wide lazy vacuum" -- Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]alvh.no-ip.org>) "Saca el libro que tu religión considere como el indicado para encontrar la oración que traiga paz a tu alma. Luego rebootea el computador y ve si funciona" (Carlos Duclós) ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
