On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 19:09 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 11:41:24PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote: > > > Forgive me if this is wrong, but I took that Alvaro was applying a > > "reductio ad absurdum" argument (i.e. taking the piss). I laughed > > heartily at the thought of LAZY becoming a PostgreSQL keyword. > > Ah, well, actually you are wrong, I was really suggesting that keyword > because that's what we call the feature. It doesn't sound that bad to > me, but if you laughed at it then maybe it's really a bad idea.
Then I apologize, but agree with your conclusion. I think a headline of "PostgreSQL gets LAZY" would be irresistable for the online news scream-sheets. Best Regards, Simon Riggs ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
