On Mon, 13 Jun 2005, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005, Jan Wieck wrote:
On 6/12/2005 8:03 PM, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Couldn't behaviour of REINDEX DATABASE not take that into account, and
'skip' the system indices if not superuser?
Silently doing something other than what the user requested ... I don't
think this is the right way to become the most popular open source
database in the world.
But, we are already doing that, no? :) I know I'm one that has been bitten
by 'DATABASE' != "all tables in the database" :)
If we are, then we should stop.
sorry, I wasn't advocating that we do so, just pointing out that we were
... I like Tom's suggestion of following our VACUUM precedent, where we do
skip, but warn that we are doing so ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
