On 6/13/2005 2:29 PM, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005, Jan Wieck wrote:
On 6/12/2005 8:03 PM, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Couldn't behaviour of REINDEX DATABASE not take that into account, and
'skip' the system indices if not superuser?
Silently doing something other than what the user requested ... I don't
think this is the right way to become the most popular open source
database in the world.
But, we are already doing that, no? :) I know I'm one that has been bitten
by 'DATABASE' != "all tables in the database" :)
If we are, then we should stop.
sorry, I wasn't advocating that we do so, just pointing out that we were
... I like Tom's suggestion of following our VACUUM precedent, where we do
skip, but warn that we are doing so ...
That is a perfectly fine compromise. Do what's possible but warn the
user that not all she asked for has been accomplished.
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== [EMAIL PROTECTED] #
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
