On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 07:18:59PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> A more radical way of handling it would be to detect the relevance of an
> indexscan in indxpath.c and generate a special kind of Path node; this
> would not generalize to other sorts of things as you were hoping, but
> I'm unconvinced that the mechanism is going to be very general-purpose
> anyway. The major advantage is that this would work conveniently for
> comparing the cost of a rewritten query to a non-rewritten one.
What about having a new column in pg_aggregate which would point to a
function that would try to optimize the aggregate's handling?
There could be multiple calls to that function along the query's way to
executor, each one at a different point (with a parameter specifying
which one it is), that would try to rewrite the query optimizing the
aggregate. So we could optimize some aggregates at one point, and
others at a different point, whichever makes the most sense.
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"Hay dos momentos en la vida de un hombre en los que no debería
especular: cuando puede permitírselo y cuando no puede" (Mark Twain)
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
