Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Mon, 17 May 2004, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > > > > > > > > plPHP and plPerlNG both belong on pgfoundry, not in the core distribution > > > ... > > > > Uhhh?? Are you ripping out all core pls then? plPerlNG is supposed to > > replace plPerl, I was talking with Bruce and he seemed to think that (as > > long as the code was good enough) that we could incorporate plPHP??? > > That is the plan ... unless someone knows a reason why they can't be built > independently of the core? ecpg relies on the grammar files in core, but > as far as I knew (please correct me if I'm wrong) the pls only rely on > headers and libraries that get installed ...
Server-side languages are tied into the backend even closer than the user data types. They are best in the core distribution. We didn't put plR in core because it had a conflicting license. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
