On Mon, 17 May 2004, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > > > > plPHP and plPerlNG both belong on pgfoundry, not in the core distribution > > ... > > Uhhh?? Are you ripping out all core pls then? plPerlNG is supposed to > replace plPerl, I was talking with Bruce and he seemed to think that (as > long as the code was good enough) that we could incorporate plPHP???
That is the plan ... unless someone knows a reason why they can't be built independently of the core? ecpg relies on the grammar files in core, but as far as I knew (please correct me if I'm wrong) the pls only rely on headers and libraries that get installed ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
