> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Page [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 11:02 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [HACKERS] PITR Dead horse?
> Of course, but I would argue that my claim that PostgreSQL is reliable
> is backed up by the lack of people posting messages like 'we had a
> powercut and now my DB is hosed'.
It's not like that. It's more like 'what will happen if we had a
powercut/
disk failure/cpu failure/memory failure, etc, etc.' and that answer I
have
to give is 'why, there is PITR of course!'. No other answer will pass in
enterprise world. Those people are not open-minded, they'd rather be
safe
than sorry.
>
> Do they have specific problems with the reliability of PostgreSQL
then?
> Perhaps you could post details of how things have gone wrong for them
> (assuming you haven't already - I don't recall anything on -hackers
> recently).
Nothing remarkable. PostgreSQL just works. Bu as I said before,
In enterprise world, good sleep at night is treasured above all.
> Regards, Dave
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match
