Dave Page wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Nicolai Tufar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 05 February 2004 00:01 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PITR Dead horse? > > > > Totally agree. Robustness and rock-solidness are the only > > things missing for PostgreSQL to become the killer of certain > > commercial enterprise databases out there. > > Well I've only been using PostgreSQL since 1997 and the *only* release I > ever had problems with was 6.3.2. We also use(d) Informix SE, DB2, > Unidata and SQL Server and only Informix and Unidata come close to the > robustness of PostgreSQL - and they're not the ones we need to worry > about. > > Now I'm not saying we shouldn't be continually looking to improve > things, but I don't think this is quite the problem you imply.
I assume he was talking about the lack of data recovery in cases of hard drive failure --- we now require you restore from backup or use a replicated machine/drive setup. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
