Tom Lane said: > Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Right. And if we have sessionids we would want them logged there, I >> think. And that would rule out anything based on xid or backend pid. > > Uh, what's wrong with backend pid? Since we fork before we start doing > anything with a connection, it should surely be available soon enough > for the connection log message. > > Larry's idea about combining PID and backend start time didn't sound > too unreasonable to me. >
It did to me too. I was just looking at this code 2 days ago. Somehow when I looked again I thought we logged connections in the postmaster. Larry's idea should work just fine. For log compactness I think I'd hexencode it - the SessionID doesn't need any semantics, it's just like a cookie. cheers andrew ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
