Tom Lane said: > Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I'm not sure I understand. I didn't suggest that a sequence should be >> used for txn ids. For the purpose I had in mind we would call >> nextval() once per connection, > > Oh, okay, I misunderstood. But why not just use the PID? >
Bruce and others have suggested that PID is not sufficiently unique. Personally, I can live with it :-) cheers andrew ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
