On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Jeff Davis wrote: > I can't point to any OSS project that completely renames its parts. I > think a shortened version of the name makes sense (in this case > "postgres" works well, but so does "pgsql"), and other projects do > similar things. "Psql" for the client and "postmaster" for the daemon > are the ones that really confuse people, I think.
I don't know, doesn't one of the databases out there use 'monitor' as their equivalent to psql? ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
