Tom Lane wrote: > Christopher Kings-Lynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > What about bumping the libpq version? > > After thinking more, I realized we only need a minor version bump not > major (AFAIR there were no backwards-incompatible API changes this time, > only additions). That's already been done; so my gripe of yesterday > was incorrect. Never mind ...
Or, should I say, "Glad we are OK with current libpq version numbers". -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
