Christopher Kings-Lynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What about bumping the libpq version?
After thinking more, I realized we only need a minor version bump not
major (AFAIR there were no backwards-incompatible API changes this time,
only additions). That's already been done; so my gripe of yesterday
was incorrect. Never mind ...
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
