Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Andrew Sullivan writes: > > > Does the proposal of allowing dbas to run that risk, provided there's a > > mechanism to tell them about it, satisfy the objection (assuming, of > > course, 2PC can be turned off)? > > Why would you spent time on implementing a mechanism whose ultimate > benefit is supposed to be increasing reliability and performance, when you > already realize that it will have to lock up at the slightest sight of > trouble? There are better mechanisms out there that you can use instead.
If you want cross-server transactions, what other methods are there that are more reliable? It seems network unreliability is going to be a problem no matter what method you use. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
