Andrew Sullivan writes: > Does the proposal of allowing dbas to run that risk, provided there's a > mechanism to tell them about it, satisfy the objection (assuming, of > course, 2PC can be turned off)?
Why would you spent time on implementing a mechanism whose ultimate benefit is supposed to be increasing reliability and performance, when you already realize that it will have to lock up at the slightest sight of trouble? There are better mechanisms out there that you can use instead. -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
