Alvaro Herrera writes:
> Are you going to change "relation" to "table"? In most cases that is
> the intended meaning. ISTM in some other cases it refers to anything
> that can appear in pg_class, but I'm not 100% sure.
There are a few cases where it was obvious that only a table could be
meant, but I didn't look really hard to find such places. I think there
would be some merit to resolving the fuzziness surrounding the term
"relation" before issuing messages to the user, but I'm unsure from which
end to attack it.
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match
