On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 05:37:59PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I've looked through the messages in the backend and identified some areas
> that still deserve some cleanup. Below I list some issues that deserve
> some discussion or that deserve being remembered by other developers.
>
> id, oid, pid -> ID, OID, PID
> attribute -> column
> tuple -> row or row state, depending on context
Are you going to change "relation" to "table"? In most cases that is
the intended meaning. ISTM in some other cases it refers to anything
that can appear in pg_class, but I'm not 100% sure.
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match
