Hiroshi Inoue wrote: Gaetano Mendola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
instead. Because it was impossible to make REINDEX transaction-safe then, such flag was needed to suppress inconsistency as less as possible.
This mean that the actual REINDEX is not transaction-safe ?
No. It was not transaction-safe long time ago.
Anyway I think there is a nasty bug somewhere, see my last posts about "duplication primary key".
Regards Gaetano Mendola
---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
