Tom Lane wrote: > > "Hiroshi Inoue" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I require you to explain me why you committed the change > > with no discussion and little investigation. > > If you want an apology for not having discussed it in advance, I'll > gladly offer one. It was poorly done. Thanks. > I do, however, think that the reindexing code needs work. Can we > get on with discussing the technical issues? OK but I would need some time to remember the code. regards, Hiroshi Inoue http://www.geocities.jp/inocchichichi/psqlodbc/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
- [HACKERS] Improving REINDEX for system indexes (long) Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Improving REINDEX for system indexes (l... Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] Improving REINDEX for system indexe... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Improving REINDEX for system in... Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] Improving REINDEX for system indexe... Kurt Roeckx
- Re: [HACKERS] Improving REINDEX for system in... Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] Improving REINDEX for system indexes (l... Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] Improving REINDEX for system indexe... Gaetano Mendola
- Re: [HACKERS] Improving REINDEX for system in... Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] Improving REINDEX for syste... Gaetano Mendola
- Re: [HACKERS] Improving REINDEX for system indexes (l... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Improving REINDEX for system indexe... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Improving REINDEX for system in... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Improving REINDEX for system in... Alvaro Herrera