On 2017-09-25 13:50:29 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > >> On 25/09/17 19:26, Tom Lane wrote: > >>> The problem with this type of argument is that it leads directly to the > >>> conclusion that every feature users want must be in core. > > > ... I don't think that should mean that there's no possible output > > plugin that could/should be integrated into core. > > Yeah, my point is just that the argument needs to be about why a > *particular* plugin is valuable enough to justify adding it to the > core developers' maintenance workload.
+1 Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
