Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes:
>> On 25/09/17 19:26, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> The problem with this type of argument is that it leads directly to the
>>> conclusion that every feature users want must be in core.
> ... I don't think that should mean that there's no possible output
> plugin that could/should be integrated into core.
Yeah, my point is just that the argument needs to be about why a
*particular* plugin is valuable enough to justify adding it to the
core developers' maintenance workload.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
