Michael Paquier wrote: > On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 11:14 AM, Michael Paquier > <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Or we could make upgradecheck a noop, then remove it once all the MSVC > > animals have upgraded to a newer version of the buildfarm client which > > does not use upgradecheck anymore (I am fine to send a patch or a pull > > request to Andrew for that). > > This patch is logged as "waiting on author" in the current commit > fest, but any new patch will depend on the feedback that any other > hacker has to offer based on the set of ideas I have posted upthread. > Hence I am yet unsure what is the correct way to move things forward. > So, any opinions? Peter or others?
I think the first step is to send the rebased version of the patch. It was last posted in April ... -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
