Michael Paquier wrote: > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> writes: > >> I don't like breaking the abstraction of pg_log() with the existing > >> flags with some kind of pg_debug() layer. The set of APIs present now > >> in pg_rewind for logging is nice to have, and I think that those debug > >> messages should be translated. So what about the attached? > > > > Your point about INT64_FORMAT not necessarily working with fprintf > > is an outstanding reason not to keep it like it is. I've not reviewed > > this patch in detail but I think this is basically the way to fix it. > > So, perhaps it would be better to fix that before the next point release?
Sure, I'll get it done on Friday, or tomorrow if I can manage it. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
