On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 11:26 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> writes: >> I don't like breaking the abstraction of pg_log() with the existing >> flags with some kind of pg_debug() layer. The set of APIs present now >> in pg_rewind for logging is nice to have, and I think that those debug >> messages should be translated. So what about the attached? > > Your point about INT64_FORMAT not necessarily working with fprintf > is an outstanding reason not to keep it like it is. I've not reviewed > this patch in detail but I think this is basically the way to fix it.
So, perhaps it would be better to fix that before the next point release? -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
