On 5/6/17 14:50, Noah Misch wrote: >> I consider this item low priority and don't plan to work on it before >> all the other open items under logical replication are addressed. >> >> (Here, working on it would include thinking further about whether it is >> necessary at all or what alternatives might look like.) > > That's informative, but it's not a valid status update. This PostgreSQL 10 > open item is past due for your status update. Kindly send a valid status > update within 24 hours. Refer to the policy on open item ownership: > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com
Fair enough. I have set myself a reminder to report back on May 30. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
