On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 11:01:57AM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 5/2/17 21:44, Noah Misch wrote: > >> I wonder if we should have an --no-subscriptions option, now that they > >> are dumped by default, just like we have --no-blobs, --no-owner, > >> --no-password, --no-privileges, --no-acl, --no-tablespaces, and > >> --no-security-labels. It seems like there is probably a fairly large > >> use case for excluding subscriptions even if you have sufficient > >> permissions to dump them. > > > > [Action required within three days. This is a generic notification.] > > > > The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 10 open item. Peter, > > since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this open > > item. If some other commit is more relevant or if this does not belong as a > > v10 open item, please let us know. Otherwise, please observe the policy on > > open item ownership[1] and send a status update within three calendar days > > of > > this message. Include a date for your subsequent status update. Testers > > may > > discover new open items at any time, and I want to plan to get them all > > fixed > > well in advance of shipping v10. Consequently, I will appreciate your > > efforts > > toward speedy resolution. Thanks. > > I consider this item low priority and don't plan to work on it before > all the other open items under logical replication are addressed. > > (Here, working on it would include thinking further about whether it is > necessary at all or what alternatives might look like.)
That's informative, but it's not a valid status update. This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update. Kindly send a valid status update within 24 hours. Refer to the policy on open item ownership: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
