On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 04:41, Nigel J. Andrews wrote:
>
> On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Maybe a better strategy would be to get a release out soon but not wait
> > > 6 months for another release which would contain the Win32 port and the
> > > PITR stuff (assuming those aren't done in time for this release).
> > >
> > > Just a thought.
> >
> > And definitely in agreement here ... I'd rather see a shortened dev cycle
> > prompted by a big feature being added, then delaying a release because "oh
> > oh, I need another few weeks" that draws out when something unexpected
> > happens :(
> >
> >...
>
> I'm not sure why another delay is being considered. There's been a delay of
> a week because of the server problems hasn't there and wasn't the original
> delay only acceptable on the basis that that was that and there wasn't going to
> be another extension?
>
There really isn't for this release. Any talk of delay is just a thought
on general policy for future releases.
Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
